Article Index |
---|
Using HDTV antenna for ham radio |
Initial Testing |
Simulation |
All Pages |
Page 2 of 3
Testing
Here is the antenna mounted on a test pole I have on the balcony. I took some preliminary measurements using by VNA as well as having some people from the CVARC ham club send some test transmission (Thanks for TIM-K6POI Todd-KD6RCM and Zak-N6PK for helping out). Since the impedance if 75 Ohms I tried a quick transmission but did not measure anything (only Tim was able to hear me on 2M).
Here are the results from the VNA on 2M and 70cm.
As can be seen the VSWR is very bad on these bands (as expected from the impedance mismatch). 70cm looks much better, but still not very good.
Here are the results. Tim's station was 7.12889km away from the antenna at about 130 degrees to the antenna.
Angle | Test1@60W (dBm) |
Normalized (dBm) |
Test2@60W (dBm) |
Normalized (dBm) |
Test3@20W (dBm) |
Normalized (dBm) |
0 | -104 | -5 | -105 | -7 | -112 | -6 |
25.7143 | -104 | -5 | -105 | -7 | -113 | -7 |
51.4286 | -103 | -4 | -104 | -6 | -112 | -6 |
77.1429 | -102 | -3 | -103 | -5 | -109 | -3 |
102.8571 | -100 | -1 | -101 | -3 | -107 | -1 |
128.5714 | -99 | 0 | -100 | -2 | -106 | 0 |
154.2857 | -100 | -1 | -98 | 0 | -106 | 0 |
180 | -103 | -4 | -99 | -1 | -109 | -3 |
205.7143 | -113 | -14 | -103 | -5 | -114 | -8 |
231.4286 | -115 | -16 | -108 | -10 | -116 | -10 |
257.1429 | -111 | -12 | -116 | -18 | -117 | -11 |
282.8571 | -109 | -10 | -114 | -16 | -115 | -9 |
308.5714 | -108 | -9 | -108 | -10 | -116 | -10 |
334.2857 | -107 | -8 | -107 | -9 | -115 | -9 |
Here is a normalized polar plot for the 60W transmission.
Since I did not measure the power on a reference dipole antenna, I could not determine the gain correctly.
Theoretically, using Friis equation (taking the log to simplify things), and a theoretical 2.15 dB half dipole, I should be getting -38dBm.
TX Power (dBm) + TX Gain (dBi) + (-32.44 - 20 log(Freq MHz) - 20log(Dist km) ) + RX gain (dBi) = RX power (dBm)
47.781513 dBm + 4.5 dBi + (-32.44 - 20* LOG(146.55,10) - 20*LOG(7.12889)) + 2.15 = -38dBm
Which is very far from the -98dBm I was getting. This is probably because of all the interference between us, so next time I would need to measure the actual received power on a dipole.